He still has to configure his system to reflect that, though:
1:124/0 bbs.endofthelinebbs.com:24554 2604:880:52:866:f1d0:1:124:5016 No such AKA.
1:124/0 bbs.endofthelinebbs.com:24554 192.138.210.158 No such AKA.
New RIN in R50: ,701,Jungle_Deere_Nest,SunHill,Ivan_Nazaroff,-Unpublished-,300,CM,IBN,INA:fido.club.noho.st
There is a tcp connect, but no mailer responding on the binkp port?
New node in net 382 (Serbia): ,200,Pilot_Pirx_BBS,Belgrade,Artem_Nemenchinsky,-Unpublished-,300,CM,IBN,INA:164.92.205.248
Connect with binkd/1.1a-115/Linux.
Regards, Wilfred
--- FMail-lnx64 2.3.2.4-B20240523
* Origin: NPC Station (2:280/464)
From Nigel Reed@1:124/5016 to Wilfred van Velzen on Friday, February 28, 2025 13:59:05
Re: Weekly nodelist report on noteworthy changes (059)
By: Wilfred van Velzen to All on Fri Feb 28 2025 12:43:09
He still has to configure his system to reflect that, though:
1:124/0 bbs.endofthelinebbs.com:24554 2604:880:52:866:f1d0:1:124:5016 No such AKA.
1:124/0 bbs.endofthelinebbs.com:24554 192.138.210.158 No such AKA.
That has been taken care of on the binkd side. I just need to recycle the bbs for it to pick up the node addition which I will do later.
--- SBBSecho 3.23-Linux
* Origin: End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com (1:124/5016)
From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to Nigel Reed on Friday, February 28, 2025 21:55:39
Hi Nigel,
On 2025-02-28 13:59:05, you wrote to me:
He still has to configure his system to reflect that, though:
1:124/0 bbs.endofthelinebbs.com:24554 2604:880:52:866:f1d0:1:124:5016
No such AKA.
1:124/0 bbs.endofthelinebbs.com:24554 192.138.210.158 No such AKA.
That has been taken care of on the binkd side.
Confirmed!
I just need to recycle the bbs for it to pick up the node addition
which I will do later.
Great!
Bye, Wilfred.
--- FMail-lnx64 2.3.2.4-B20240523
* Origin: NPC Station (2:280/464)
From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to All on Friday, March 07, 2025 13:02:05
Hi All,
New node in net 153: ,153,Silent_Node,Prince_George_BC,John_Gerwing,-Unpublished-,300,CM,XA,INA:silentnode.ddns.net,IBN
Connect with: BinkIT/2.41,JSBinkP/4,sbbs3.20b/Win32
BinkIT in combination with FreqIT (if configured) can only support XW, so XA is wrong.
In net 123 still: ,1185,Slinky's_Place,Phenix_City_AL_USA,Steven_Bennett,-Unpublished-,300,CM,INA:slinkybbs.com,IBN,U,Shut_down_early_Nov_2024
Why isn't this node removed already, and why wasn't the Down flag used?
"New" node in net 250: ,101,TCOB1-back-stop,Connemara_EIRE,Sean_Rima,-Unpublished-,300,CM,XX,INA:binkd.rima.ie,IBN
Connect with BBBS/LiR v4.10 Toy-7
New host for net 263: Host,263,Ireland(EIRE)_Net,Letterfrack_Galway_Ireland,Sean_Rima,-Unpublished-,300,CM,XX,INA:binkd.rima.ie,IBN
Net 263 tests OK for both nodes and the host.
I don't understand why Sean also "needs" a node number in net 250? It's only an AKA for his Host/Node in net 263.
And he shows this AKA: 2:26/0.0@fidonet which doesn't exist in the nodelist, and do we really need another Region with only 2 nodes?
Regards, Wilfred
--- FMail-lnx64 2.3.2.4-B20240523
* Origin: NPC Station (2:280/464)
From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to All on Friday, March 07, 2025 13:07:13
Hi All,
On 2025-02-28 12:43:09, I wrote to you:
New RIN in R50: ,701,Jungle_Deere_Nest,SunHill,Ivan_Nazaroff,-Unpublished-,300,CM,IBN ,INA:fido.club.noho.st
There is a tcp connect, but no mailer responding on the binkp port?
There is now a normal connect with: jNode ver. 1.5
Is this a new mailer?
Bye, Wilfred.
--- FMail-lnx64 2.3.2.4-B20240523
* Origin: NPC Station (2:280/464)
From Michiel van der Vlist@2:280/5555 to Wilfred van Velzen on Friday, March 07, 2025 15:57:19
Hello Wilfred,
On Friday March 07 2025 13:07, you wrote to All:
There is now a normal connect with: jNode ver. 1.5
Is this a new mailer?
I vagely recall having seen jNode as a mailer before but I do not recall where.
Cheers, Michiel
--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20170303
* Origin: Nodelist Police Station (2:280/5555)
From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to Michiel van der Vlist on Friday, March 07, 2025 16:59:56
Hi Michiel,
On 2025-03-07 15:57:19, you wrote to me:
There is now a normal connect with: jNode ver. 1.5
Is this a new mailer?
MvdV> I vagely recall having seen jNode as a mailer before but I do not recall
MvdV> where.
I did a search: It hasn't been mentioned in this area before.
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5--b20180707
* Origin: As for me, all I know is that, I know nothing. (2:280/5003.4)
From Tommi Koivula@2:221/360 to Wilfred van Velzen on Friday, March 07, 2025 20:11:38
Hi Wilfred.
07 Mar 25 13:07, you wrote to All:
There is now a normal connect with: jNode ver. 1.5
Is this a new mailer?
BinkP mailer in HotDogEd is based on jNode. So not very new.
incoming session with 2001:999:2e8:438:22e:9307:43e2:5e
SYS Yet another Android point
ZYZ Tommi Koivula
LOC Android device
NDL 115200,TCP,BINKP
VER jNode/Android binkp/1.1
TIME Fri, 07 Mar 2025 19:04:51 +0200
'Tommi
---
* Origin: nntps://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/360)
From Alan Ianson@1:153/757 to Wilfred van Velzen on Friday, March 07, 2025 15:53:18
New node in net 153:
,153,Silent_Node,Prince_George_BC,John_Gerwing,-Unpublished-,300,CM,XA,INA:sil
ntnode.ddns.net,IBN
Connect with: BinkIT/2.41,JSBinkP/4,sbbs3.20b/Win32
BinkIT in combination with FreqIT (if configured) can only support XW, so XA is wrong.
Ah, I am not sure of what flags what supports. I'll get that corrected.
--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Toy-7
* Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757)
From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to Alan Ianson on Saturday, March 08, 2025 11:34:28
Hi Alan,
On 2025-03-07 15:53:18, you wrote to me:
New node in net 153:
,153,Silent_Node,Prince_George_BC,John_Gerwing,-Unpublished-,300,CM,XA,
INA:si
l ntnode.ddns.net,IBN Connect with: BinkIT/2.41,JSBinkP/4,sbbs3.20b/Win32
BinkIT in combination with FreqIT (if configured) can only support XW, so XA
is wrong.
Ah, I am not sure of what flags what supports. I'll get that corrected.
I think most people don't know the details, and just put XA in the list. :-(
And you should know, when a node is IBN only it can only support the WaZOO protocol. That narrows it down a lot! And leaves only XW and XX, and the choice comes down to the implementation details of the freq processor used by a node.
Bye, Wilfred.
--- FMail-lnx64 2.3.2.4-B20240523
* Origin: NPC Station (2:280/464)
From Dan Clough@1:135/115 to Wilfred van Velzen on Saturday, March 08, 2025 08:55:03
Wilfred van Velzen wrote to Alan Ianson <=-
New node in net 153:
,153,Silent_Node,Prince_George_BC,John_Gerwing,-Unpublished-,300,CM,XA,
INA:si
l ntnode.ddns.net,IBN Connect with: BinkIT/2.41,JSBinkP/4,sbbs3.20b/Win32
BinkIT in combination with FreqIT (if configured) can only support XW, so XA
is wrong.
Ah, I am not sure of what flags what supports. I'll get that corrected.
I think most people don't know the details, and just put XA in the
list. :-(
And you should know, when a node is IBN only it can only support the WaZOO protocol. That narrows it down a lot! And leaves only XW and XX, and the choice comes down to the implementation details of the freq processor used by a node.
Thank you for this information, as I am thinking about adding FREQ
capability to my system (running Synchronet).
Can you tell me how you know that IBN-only can only use the WaZOO
protocol? I'm unable to find any info on that. Also how can we tell
that BinkIT/FreqIT cannot do update requests (XX)?
General info on Bark/WaZOO would also be nice to read about.
Thanks.
... White dwarf seeks red giant for binary relationship.
=== MultiMail/Linux v0.52
--- SBBSecho 3.23-Linux
* Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:135/115)
From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to Dan Clough on Saturday, March 08, 2025 17:38:03
Hi Dan,
On 2025-03-08 08:55:03, you wrote to me:
I think most people don't know the details, and just put XA in the
list. :-(
And you should know, when a node is IBN only it can only support the
WaZOO protocol. That narrows it down a lot! And leaves only XW and XX,
and the choice comes down to the implementation details of the freq
processor used by a node.
Thank you for this information, as I am thinking about adding FREQ capability to my system (running Synchronet).
Ok.
Can you tell me how you know that IBN-only can only use the WaZOO protocol?
I educated myself when I was wondering about these flags. ;-)
Bark is an extension to the FTS-0001 (modem) protocol. Binkp is a completely different protocol, so by definition it can not speak bark.
And that basically is sending .req files. And as any mailer can send files, binkd can support file request, if you install a (external) file request processor.
Also how can we tell that BinkIT/FreqIT cannot do update requests
(XX)?
I tested this, and later confirmed it with Rob.
General info on Bark/WaZOO would also be nice to read about.
See above...
Bye, Wilfred.
--- FMail-lnx64 2.3.2.4-B20240523
* Origin: NPC Station (2:280/464)
From Dan Clough@1:135/115 to Wilfred van Velzen on Saturday, March 08, 2025 14:02:53
Wilfred van Velzen wrote to Dan Clough <=-
Thank you for this information, as I am thinking about adding FREQ capability to my system (running Synchronet).
Ok.
Can you tell me how you know that IBN-only can only use the WaZOO protocol?
I educated myself when I was wondering about these flags. ;-)
Bark is an extension to the FTS-0001 (modem) protocol. Binkp is a completely different protocol, so by definition it can not speak bark.
And that basically is sending .req files. And as any mailer can send files, binkd can support file request, if you install a (external) file request processor.
Also how can we tell that BinkIT/FreqIT cannot do update requests
(XX)?
I tested this, and later confirmed it with Rob.
General info on Bark/WaZOO would also be nice to read about.