I discovered long ago that they are not. Speaking for only those Democrats in political office, there are:
1. Communists.
2. Puppets.
3. Wokies (who are basically puppets because they have no brains of

You're definitely seeing things that I don't yet understand.

But I think the point that's slipping by is this:
The Democrat Leadership wanted Stevens. She's stupid, fake, etc. and a perfect puppet.
But someone took over the Michigan Voter Fraud Machine to pump up Abdul
- and did it WITHOUT the leadership's approval.

You might think I'm being ridiculous, but I still don't believe it. Something's off. I understand that Haley was an established Democrat in congress, but did she do something to irk the elite? Maybe she voted with Republicans on something? The elite don't take kindly to things like that.

Or if I'm way off on that idea, I still think the Democrat party is getting what they want with these "Socialist" candidates. By propping them up (whoever is propping them up) they're putting the idea into peoples' heads that "Socialism is actually ok, and it's what a lot of people want." By creating this illusion, they could actually defeat democracy once and for all.

This puts our SoS, and the Dems, in a very bad spot. If they expose the machine, most of them go to prison for rigging elections for years (this Machine has been in place for a LONG time), but they prevent the Communists from winning.

I'm sure that I'm not understanding this fully. but it's probably because of my bias against anything that's associated with the Democratic party.

IIUC: You suspect that the DSA might be willing to expose voter fraud? At the Democrats' expense?

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
* Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)

Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-

I discovered long ago that they are not. Speaking for only those Democrats in political office, there are:
1. Communists.
2. Puppets.
3. Wokies (who are basically puppets because they have no brains of

You're definitely seeing things that I don't yet understand.

We need to be careful not to fall in to the Left's mode of thinking that a person is a member of a group that all think alike.

People are individuals. Individuals that have common interests tend to "cling" together. But they are still individuals.

So not all Democrats are alike. Some actually want to do good. Some want power/money. Some want to push their ignorant agendas. Some are just useless morons who want free stuff. It's important that we deal with these individuals appropriately.

But someone took over the Michigan Voter Fraud Machine to pump up Abdul
- and did it WITHOUT the leadership's approval.

You might think I'm being ridiculous, but I still don't believe it. Something's off. I understand that Haley was an established Democrat in congress, but did she do something to irk the elite? Maybe she voted
with Republicans on something? The elite don't take kindly to things
like that.

That's what I initially thought. But then I see all the other Michigan Dems running as far from Abdul as far as they could.

Abdul was **not** the person they want to be associated with and were certainly surprised that the Primary turned out the way it did. It's pretty normal now for Democrats to cheat in their own Primaries, so everyone involved is unsurprised at the results. But Abdul getting elected surprised them - a lot!

Or if I'm way off on that idea, I still think the Democrat party is getting what they want with these "Socialist" candidates.

Yup. What they wanted was a return to Feudalism where they were Lords. Socialism was a way toward that goal - since that path aways leads to Totaltitaranism.

But the Dems expected to be the Lords, and now that idea seems to be slipping away - no matter what happens.

As DiNiro found out, if the Communists win, they are coming after the Dem leadership to get their money for their failed communist policies. After all, Communism only works until you run out of other people's money.

And as the people with brains know, Communism it bad. So they won't be voting Communism (unless there's cheating going on).

The Democratic Party knows that they are now in a no-win scenario.

By propping
them up (whoever is propping them up) they're putting the idea into peoples' heads that "Socialism is actually ok, and it's what a lot of people want." By creating this illusion, they could actually defeat democracy once and for all.

But the only people that fools are the brainless bots in their Leftie bubble. And that doesn't represent the vast majority of the public. That's why they needed illegals on the voter rolls. That's why they need to commit voter fraud.

They can't win with a free and fail election.

IIUC: You suspect that the DSA might be willing to expose voter fraud?
At the Democrats' expense?

Not quite.

The DSA is able to use the Voter Fraud Machines without Democrat Party "permission".

Remember the idea that I talked about before: A loosely coupled system, where there was no direct connection between the people who committed the crimes and the Democrat Leadership. Basically programmed bots, certain words/actions trigger them to do things. So there's no command-and-control structure to implicate the leadership.

If other people can trigger this without the Party's permission, that's a problem.

So the Democrat Party has a choice:
1. Expose the Voter Fraud Machine to get the Communists disqualified. But that would also expose much of the Democrat Leadership that set it up to some pretty severe punishments and dismantle the Voter Fraud Machine.
or
2. Keep quiet and try to wrest control of the Voter Fraud Machine back, risking that it might be used to elect a Communist that will hurt the whole area - especially Democrat Elitists who have amassed wealth by graft.


... The only dumb question is one you haven't asked yet.
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
* Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)

That's what I initially thought. But then I see all the other Michigan Dems running as far from Abdul as far as they could.

Abdul was **not** the person they want to be associated with and were certainly surprised that the Primary turned out the way it did. It's pretty normal now for Democrats to cheat in their own Primaries, so everyone involved is unsurprised at the results. But Abdul getting elected surprised them - a lot!

If this is true (and not a hoax) then they (typical Democrats) must realize that there's a problem with their rigged voting system; it's not rigged properly if candidates from outside their bubble are able to (1) wander in and
(2) win a primary. I thought they were on top of these things.

But the Dems expected to be the Lords, and now that idea seems to be slipping away - no matter what happens.

I still can't believe that they're 2 different groups, and I'll never be able to think of them as individuals. Look how they behave in congress. I can't expect that a "DSA Democrat" is going to vote any differently from a "Soros Democrat." As long as they do what China wants, then I'm convinced that they're well on their way to becoming successful feudalists.

As DiNiro found out, if the Communists win, they are coming after the Dem leadership to get their money for their failed communist policies.
After all, Communism only works until you run out of other people's
money.

We can't expect that the "good Democrats" are smart enough to save themselves from their own monsters. Another thing to beware of: The socialists can just as easily infiltrate the Republican party, if they haven't already.

The Democratic Party knows that they are now in a no-win scenario.

We all are, if Republicans don't ever get a game plan.

Remember the idea that I talked about before: A loosely coupled system, where there was no direct connection between the people who committed
the crimes and the Democrat Leadership. Basically programmed bots, certain words/actions trigger them to do things. So there's no command-and-control structure to implicate the leadership.

I think I'm beginning to understand. So it's a bunch of people who are warm to the idea of socialism, but they aren't necessarily affiliated. They want to be socialist leaders wherever they can, even if it's just in a city. And Democrat voters (due to how gullible they are) are making it a slam dunk for some of them.

So the Democrat Party has a choice:
1. Expose the Voter Fraud Machine to get the Communists disqualified.
But that would also expose much of the Democrat Leadership that set it
up to some pretty severe punishments and dismantle the Voter Fraud Machine. or
2. Keep quiet and try to wrest control of the Voter Fraud Machine back, risking that it might be used to elect a Communist that will hurt the whole area - especially Democrat Elitists who have amassed wealth by graft.

Their choice seems obvious. #2 it is.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
* Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)

I don't like Fox News that much, but I stay tuned anyway. I noticed that they are paying way too much attention to a Democrat Nominee for US Senate named Abdul El-Sayed.

One day it was "El-Sayed is an extremist," the next day it was "El-Sayed doesn't like Usha Vance," and today it's "El-Sayed doesn't like Dolly Parton."

All this attention they're paying is going to distract Michigan voters from whoever El_sayed is running against. When they fill out their ballots, the only name they're going to recognize is "El-Sayed," and if they are careless, then that's the one that's going to trigger their marker.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
* Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)

Aaron Thomas wrote to All <=-

I don't like Fox News that much, but I stay tuned anyway.

Well, they ARE Controlled Opposition. So I always take what they say/do with more than a few grains of salt.

All this attention they're paying is going to distract Michigan voters from whoever El_sayed is running against.

So that means we need to focus on Mike Rogers.

Whenever the Media is saying "look over there!" we need to look at what they are trying to distract us from.

When they fill out their
ballots, the only name they're going to recognize is "El-Sayed," and if they are careless, then that's the one that's going to trigger their marker.

I doubt that. Abdul is offensive on so many levels that the Dems had to cheat to make him the winner in the Primaries.

Did you know that the voter turnout in Detroit was nearly 200% of registered voters? Ya, tell me that there's no "voter fraud" again.

The problem here is that Abdul is not electable. Actually neither was his challenger in the Primary, Haley Stevens, for that matter.

So why the distraction? What's wrong with Mike Rogers? But it doesn't matter.
Mike will win the election (unless the Democrats cheat again) because Abdul is unelectable.


... Luxuriantly hand-crafted from only the finest ASCII.
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
* Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)

Whenever the Media is saying "look over there!" we need to look at what they are trying to distract us from.

I'm hoping that more and more people start seeing it that way.

So why the distraction? What's wrong with Mike Rogers? But it doesn't matter. Mike will win the election (unless the Democrats cheat again) because Abdul is unelectable.

"If the Democrats cheat again" is not iffy. They're going to try something, but maybe since it's a US election maybe the USSC's ruling on mail-in ballots will be of assistance.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
* Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)

Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-

"If the Democrats cheat again" is not iffy. They're going to try something,

They did in the Primaries. That's how Abdul "won". Stevens was ahead and there was a "late night ballot drop for Abdul". Interestingly Detroit had a nearly 200% turnout for the Primaries.

but maybe since it's a US election maybe the USSC's ruling
on mail-in ballots will be of assistance.

It will make it harder. Now we need Federal Agents securing the polls to stop late night ballot drops and the Dems from running the same batches of ballots through the machines multiple times.


... This is your brain. Postscript on brain your is This.
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
* Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)

They did in the Primaries. That's how Abdul "won". Stevens was ahead
and there was a "late night ballot drop for Abdul". Interestingly
Detroit had a nearly 200% turnout for the Primaries.

This surprises me because I firmly believe that all Democrats are the same.

There could be only 1 explanation for why they care about which puppet wins a primary: favorability. Maybe they think that El-Sayed has a better chance of defeating the Republican than the other Democrats do. After all, they do seem to be investing a lot into Fox News.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
* Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)

Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-

This surprises me because I firmly believe that all Democrats are the same.

I discovered long ago that they are not. Speaking for only those Democrats in political office, there are:
1. Communists.
2. Puppets.
3. Wokies (who are basically puppets because they have no brains of their own. eg. AOC)

There could be only 1 explanation for why they care about which puppet wins a primary: favorability. Maybe they think that El-Sayed has a
better chance of defeating the Republican than the other Democrats do. After all, they do seem to be investing a lot into Fox News.

Abdul has no chance of winning a fair election. Stevens didn't have any chance either. So both candidates were awful for the Democrats.

But I think the point that's slipping by is this:
The Democrat Leadership wanted Stevens. She's stupid, fake, etc. and a perfect puppet.
But someone took over the Michigan Voter Fraud Machine to pump up Abdul - and did it WITHOUT the leadership's approval.

This means that the Voter Fraud Machine is NOT under Democrat control. It's under DSA control.

This puts our SoS, and the Dems, in a very bad spot. If they expose the machine, most of them go to prison for rigging elections for years (this Machine has been in place for a LONG time), but they prevent the Communists from winning.
Or say nothing, let the Machine do it's job, but we'll "elect" a Communist.


... Life is a game. Money is how we keep score.
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
* Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)