Message pointers determine what message you'll see in a new-scan based on their *import* date/time, not the date/time they were supposedly written (which is the date/time shown in the message header to users). So, not weird really. Someone just dumped some old messages into a network, it happens a lot.
Well, since the user can't see the import date (or can they?),
makes more sense (IMO) to have the pointers use the date written
date, which is more meaningful to the user.
Except that messages are imported or sorted by "written date".
Except that messages are imported or sorted by "written date".
Message pointers determine what message you'll see in a new-scan based
on their *import* date/time, not the date/time they were supposedly
written (which is the date/time shown in the message header to users).
Re: Good Pointers
By: Digital Man to Mortar on Sun Jan 18 2026 19:19:50
Except that messages are imported or sorted by "written date".
If that were the case, then I shouldn't be seeing msgs. from 2020. This seems to be a contradiction to...
| Sysop: | Gargoyle |
|---|---|
| Location: | Wayne, OK |
| Users: | 21 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 80:35:24 |
| Calls: | 146 |
| Files: | 295 |
| Messages: | 66,633 |